Methodology · Doctor report

How verba scores a visit: emotion, competence, growth

The full methodology, in detail. What is measured, from which signals of the visit, how the score is calculated and how it helps the doctor grow. This page is the reference the product links to.

Principle

An objective mirror of the visit, not an opinion

Verba does not “grade the doctor”. It turns what actually happened in the conversation into structured observations against clear criteria — which the doctor and the clinic can check.

From the conversation, not forms

The basis is the visit transcript. No subjective checklists “from memory” — only what was actually said.

By transparent criteria

Each measure breaks down into concrete signals. The doctor sees exactly what and why.

In your country, private

Analysis runs on servers in your country. The visit recording and report never leave.

Measure 1

Emotional intelligence

How the doctor builds rapport with the patient and leads them emotionally through the visit.

What is assessed

  • Empathy & support — acknowledging the patient's feelings, responding to worry and pain.
  • Active listening — doesn't interrupt, clarifies, returns to the patient's words.
  • Tone & calm — warmth, without pressure or dismissiveness.
  • Engagement — involves the patient in the decision, checks they understood.
  • Handling anxiety — how it responds to fear, doubt, objection.

How it's measured

Key cues are pulled from the transcript: the doctor's questions, pauses for the patient, acknowledging emotion, plain-language explanations. Each signal gets a score on a scale, and together they form the measure's overall score.

Empathy & rapport 4.7 / 5
Active listening 4.4 / 5
Tone & calm 4.6 / 5
Measure 2

Clinical competence

How complete and structured the visit is from a medical-logic standpoint.

What is assessed

  • History completeness — whether key complaints, history and risk factors were collected.
  • Protocol adherence — how the visit matches the clinic/specialty standard.
  • Clarity of explanation — whether the diagnosis, plan and prescriptions were explained clearly.
  • Handling doubts — whether the patient's objections and questions were addressed.
  • Safety — whether red flags, warnings or contraindications were missed.
  • Visit structure — complaint → exam → plan → agreements.

How it's measured

Verba checks the visit against a configurable specialty checklist: which blocks should appear. Some criteria are share-completed (%), some are quality on a scale. The clinic sets the benchmark.

History completeness 92%
Protocol adherence 88%
Explaining the plan 4.5 / 5
Measure 3

Growth & development

Not a snapshot but a trajectory: where the doctor is strong, what to work on, and what to do next.

Trend over time

How the scores change week by week and month by month. The effect of training and feedback is visible.

Strengths & growth areas

What's consistently strong and where dips repeat — by concrete criteria, not “in general”.

Personal recommendations

Concrete steps: what to try in the next visits. A development plan, not a verdict.

How the score is built

From the conversation to a final score

01

Signals from the visit

Key cues per criterion are pulled from the transcript — what was said and how.

02

Criteria scoring

Each criterion gets a score (1–5 scale) or a completion share (%). Weights are set by the clinic.

03

Score & trend

Criteria fold into three measure scores and an overall visit score; the doctor's trend builds up over time.

Scales, criteria and weights are configurable; the values on this page are examples.

Roles & access

Who sees what

DoctorManager
Own report per visit✓✓
Personal tips & growth plan✓—
Team trends—✓
Clinic standard adherence✓✓
Visit recording leaves the countrynono
Ethics

For development, not punishment

The report is shown first of all to the doctor. The goal is growth, not finding fault. Criteria are transparent, a score can be challenged, and the feature can be configured or switched off for specific specialties.

Discuss rollout →
Principle
The doctor sees their report first
Data
Analysis in-country, nothing leaves

Questions about the methodology

Is this surveillance of doctors?
No. The report is shown first to the doctor and serves their development. The manager sees team trends, not “wiretapping” of individual phrases.
Where does the score come from?
From the visit transcript, by transparent criteria. No subjective forms “from memory” — only what was actually said.
Can criteria be tuned to our clinic?
Yes. Checklists, scales and weights are configured per specialty and clinic standard.
Where do visit recordings go?
Nowhere abroad. Analysis runs on servers in your country; recordings and reports stay in-country.

See the report on a real visit

We'll show the methodology on your example — broken down across all three measures.

Give the doctor an hour backFree · no card · data stays in your country